Disclaimer: The statements and articles listed here, and any opinions, are those of the writers alone, and neither are opinions of nor reflect the views of this Blog. Aggregated content created by others is the sole responsibility of the writers and its accuracy and completeness are not endorsed or guaranteed. This goes for all those links, too: Blogs have no control over the information you access via such links, does not endorse that information, cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided or any analysis based thereon, and shall not be responsible for it or for the consequences of your use of that information.
FINANCIAL ARRESTS WORLDWIDE

Sunday, 3 February 2008

Isaac L. Hudson

Isaac L. Hudson, 27, of Malvern was sentenced Thursday at Malvern to serve 18 years in prison and fined $1,000 plus court costs by Seventh Judicial District Circuit Judge Phillip Shirron after a circuit court jury found Hudson guilty of committing commercial burglary.
The jury also convicted Hudson on a charge of misdemeanor theft of property. Shirron followed the jury’s recommendation and sentenced Hudson to serve one year in the Hot Spring County Jail and fined him $500.
Shirron told Hudson that by law the jail terms would run concurrently.
The jury of seven men and five women took about 30 minutes to convict Hudson and slightly more than one hour to recommend his punishment.
Hudson was convicted of a Class C felony that would ordinarily carry a prison term of not less than three years and not more than 10 years in prison. The jury recommended Hudson be sentenced as an habitual offender because of five prior felony convictions from 2002. He faced an enhanced sentence of not less than three years and not more than 30 years in prison.
The jury also recommended Hudson be placed in long-term drug treatment while incarcerated and Shirron incorporated the request into Hudson’s sentence.
According to testimony, Malvern Police Department officers were conducting a surveillance from inside a restaurant on East Page St. in Malvern about 4:30 a.m. April 30, 2007, when an inside light came on at Furniture For Less. Officers conducting the surveillance used a video camera to tape record a person, who they later identified as Hudson, exiting the closed business with a television. The officers testified that the person captured on the videotape entered a nearby apartment with the television and emerged some 10 minutes later without the television.
The officers conducting the surveillance called two patrol units to intercept the suspect as he walked west on East Page St., according to testimony. Police discovered Hudson’s identity after he was detained and questioned by patrol officers.
Seventh Judicial District Deputy Prosecutor Richard Garrett played the surveillance videotape for the jury and introduced it into evidence.
Attorney Gregory Crain, who defended Hudson along with attorney Phyllis Lemons, attacked the videotape in his opening statement.
“Take a look at what’s on the video and what’s not on the video,” Crain told jurors. “All you’ll see is someone walking.”
Crain told jurors it would be difficult to identify the person on the video image.
He also questioned why there was a 10-minute gap on the tape.
MPD Lt. Bernie Mosley testified that he was operating the camera and stopped taping while the suspect was in the apartment because the camera’s battery was low on power.
MPD Ofc. Kevin Yeagle testified that the inside light at the business caught his attention because it was the first time he had ever seen light coming from the front of the building. Testimony indicated there are no windows on the store’s front, only a roll-up garage-style door and a standard-sized entry door. Police officers conducting a follow-up investigation found the front door of the business open slightly and said the person entering the building removed a window screen and entered through a side window.
Lemons also attacked the videotape. She made a motion during noon recess out of the hearing of the jury asking for a directed verdict acquitting Hudson. Lemons said the videotape did not show the suspect clearly enough to identify any person and that the testimony of the officers contradicted what was shown on the tape.
Shirron denied Lemons’ motion for a directed verdict and allowed the case to go forward to the jury.
The defense did not present a case and Hudson did not take the stand to defend himself against the charges. He did, however, testify during the penalty phase of the trial after the jury found him guilty of the two charges.
Hudson apologized to Monty Ledbetter, who owned the furniture store at the time of the burglary, and asked the jury to be lenient when recommending his punishment.

0 comments:

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

ann croft

Disclaimer: The statements and articles listed here, and any opinions, are those of the writers alone, and neither are opinions of nor reflect the views of this Blog. Aggregated content created by others is the sole responsibility of the writers and its accuracy and completeness are not endorsed or guaranteed. This goes for all those links, too: Blogs have no control over the information you access via such links, does not endorse that information, cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided or any analysis based thereon, and shall not be responsible for it or for the consequences of your use of that information.
Disclaimer: The statements and articles listed here, and any opinions, are those of the writers alone, and neither are opinions of nor reflect the views of ProLifeBlogs. Aggregated content created by others is the sole responsibility of the writers and its accuracy and completeness are not endorsed or guaranteed. This goes for all those links, too: ProLifeBlogs has no control over the information you access via such links, does not endorse that information, cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided or any analysis based thereon, and shall not be responsible for it or for the consequences of your use of that information.
Site Specific Privacy Policy run in accordance with http://www.google.com/privacy.html
We can be reached via e-mail at
copsandbloggers@googlemail.com
For each visitor to our Web page, our Web server automatically recognizes information of your browser, IP address, City/State/Country.
We collect only the domain name, but not the e-mail address of visitors to our Web page, the e-mail addresses of those who communicate with us via e-mail.
The information we collect is used for internal review and is then discarded, used to improve the content of our Web page, used to customize the content and/or layout of our page for each individual visitor.
With respect to cookies: We use cookies to store visitors preferences, record user-specific information on what pages users access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors' browser type or other information that the visitor sends.
With respect to Ad Servers: To try and bring you offers that are of interest to you, we have relationships with other companies like Google (www.google.com/adsense) that we allow to place ads on our Web pages. As a result of your visit to our site, ad server companies may collect information such as your domain type, your IP address and clickstream information. For further information, consult the privacy policy of:
http://www.google.com/privacy.html
copsandbloggers@googlemail.com
If you feel that this site is not following its stated information policy, you may contact us at the above email address.

Privacy Policy (site specific)

Privacy Policy (site specific)
Privacy Policy :This blog may from time to time collect names and/or details of website visitors. This may include the mailing list, blog comments sections and in various sections of the Connected Internet site.These details will not be passed onto any other third party or other organisation unless we are required to by government or other law enforcement authority.If you contribute content, such as discussion comments, to the site, your contribution may be publicly displayed including personally identifiable information.Subscribers to the mailing list can unsubscribe at any time by writing to info (at) copsandbloggers@googlemail.com. This site links to independently run web sites outside of this domain. We take no responsibility for the privacy practices or content of such web sites.This site uses cookies to save login details and to collect statistical information about the numbers of visitors to the site.We use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and would like to know your options in relation to·not having this information used by these companies, click hereThis site is suitable for all ages, but not knowingly collect personal information from children under 13 years old.This policy will be updated from time to time. If we make significant changes to this policy after that time a notice will be posted on the main pages of the website.

Stats

  © Blogger template Newspaper III by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP